Standard Descriptor 3.5

Demonstrate a range of verbal and non-verbal communication strategies to support student engagement. 

Hervatin, M. (2020). Practical strategies for engaging children

in a practice setting. https://emergingminds-cdn.b-cdn.net/content/uploads/2020/08/28140817/Practical-strategies-for-engaging-children-in-a-practice-setting.pdf

Topic 7: Communication

In my experience as a preservice teacher, I initially thought that effective communication primarily related to how educators verbally communicated with children. However, after engaging with Clark (2023), I recognised that communication involves both verbal and non-verbal strategies that influence children’s abilities to participate and engage in learning. Clark (2023) emphasises the importance of slow listening, encouraging educators to give children their full attention and consider not only what children communicate verbally, but also how educators’ questions, phrases and gestures influence children’s responses. Observation is an important part of this process, as it requires educators to be present, notice children's verbal and non-verbal cues and allows sufficient time for children to express their thoughts and ideas. This learning has influenced my approach to communication, encouraging me to consider how my verbal and non-verbal strategies affect children’s engagement. Hervatin (2020) provides practical strategies, such as using developmentally appropriate language, warm facial expressions and open body language, to help children feel comfortable participating. I intended to apply these strategies in my practice to create supportive interactions that encourage children’s involvement in learning.

Standard Descriptor 3.6

Demonstrate broad knowledge of strategies that can be used to evaluate teaching programs to improve student learning. 

Growth-focused teaching evaluations 

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership

(AITSL). (2022). Growth-focused teaching evaluations [Teaching evaluation guide]. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). https://library.aitsl.edu.au/media-library/docs/default-source/archived-documents/teach-documents/growth-focused-evaluations/growth-focused-teaching-evaluations.pdf?sfvrsn=d0dce51e_0

Topic 3: Critical reflection 

In my practice as a preservice teacher, I previously believed that individual critical reflection was the primary method for evaluating teaching programs. McLeod and Giardiello (2019) prompted me to reconsider this assumption and recognise the value of alternative approaches. Their discussion of reflexivity highlights the importance of questioning personal beliefs and pedagogical decisions while remaining open to perspectives that challenge existing understandings. This has broadened my understanding of evaluation as a collaborative process involving colleagues, children and families. Additionally, AITSL (2022) Growth-focused teaching evaluation guide introduced me to strategies such as classroom observations and feedback, surveys and professional coaching. As a preservice teacher, I could invite a supervising teacher or colleague to observe a planned experience and provide feedback on my teaching strategies and children’s engagement. By combining this feedback with observations and documentation of children’s learning, I could evaluate the effectiveness of the experience and identify adjustments for future planning. This would allow me to develop my evaluative skills, learn from experienced educators and make informed decisions to improve children’s learning outcomes.

Standard Descriptor 3.7

Describe a broad range of strategies for involving parents/carers in the educative process.

Wilson, T. (2018). How to Develop Partnerships with Parents. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315412412

Topic 1: Child and family 

When I think of involving parents and carers in the educational process, I initially think of asking families about their children’s interests to inform curriculum planning. However, Feeney et al. (2023) broadened my understanding of strategies for establishing meaningful family partnerships. The authors emphasise the importance of building relationships and involving families in decisions about children’s learning and development. Similarly, my chosen resource, Wilson (2018), highlights practical approaches, including accessible communication, welcoming environments and opportunities for family participation. These resources helped me recognise that family involvement extends beyond sharing information to include reciprocal communication and collaborative decision-making. As a preservice teacher, I can apply this learning through daily conversations, written communication, family meetings and collaborative curriculum planning. By inviting families to share their children’s strengths, interests, needs and cultural perspectives, I can develop a more comprehensive understanding of each child and support families to feel valued, respected and included in the educational process.